this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1455 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not entirely sure. I recall him giving a specific job title for UAPTF. I don't recall a specific job title for AARO. I would need to go back and listen.

[–] Pandantic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks. I’m only starting to get into this in earnest so I’m trying to get my facts straight.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not a problem. This may be one of the most challenging topics from which to reliably extract facts or determine the truth. I believe that's part of its allure. Regardless of how you approach it, it's a massive story.

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I believe that’s part of its allure.

For sure. The entire field of UFO reporting as a cultural phenomenon--and really all of cryptography including bigfoot and ghosts--is one that exists in the gray areas. As soon as we have clear photos or facts one way or another, the discussion and fun is over because the conclusion is obvious (so far only in favor of one side).

We've seen this play out before with other topics many times, but science eventually answered those definitively so there's no sizable community left to discuss them anymore.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That pretty much sums up my position on this matter and how I envision the future of this community. There are essentially two options.

  1. We obtain evidence that proves this is prosaic. As a result, this community will likely fizzle out.
  2. We obtain evidence that proves the existence of Non-Human Intelligence. As a result, this community grows because many more questions will need answering.