Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

🪲

Aussie Zone Rules.

Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

🐝

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone

Kelp is on its way (www.themonthly.com.au)

submitted 2 years ago by Treevan@aussie.zone to c/environment@aussie.zone

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Heat-resistant strains of giant kelp are being planted around the Tasman Peninsula in a bid to restore the once great marine forests devastated by climate change.

Baron, who has been diving in these waters for more than 40 years, says the disappearance of the kelp has led to a wider scale collapse of the ecosystem.

With the backing of fashion-designer-turned-climate-entrepreneur Sam Elsom's Sea Forest Foundation, an initiative that hopes to help tackle the climate crisis by protecting and restoring kelp and seaweed, they began the process of planting giant kelp across more than half a hectare.

The water is surprisingly clear, and cold, and as we descend we pass over beds of golden kelp and crayweed, their honey-coloured leaves shifting in the light from above.

"We're facing the loss of kelp forests in Australia within a decade or two. That could still happen, even with what we're trying to do. But if we do nothing, you can guarantee they'll be gone. So I don't think we have the luxury of not trying."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't take it as a slight. I'm just wondering how we encourage people to work outside of the capitalistic system. I do volunteer work too and I don't see many people there, particularly of an employable age (most people are geriatric as they have the time).

Perhaps a UBI could get more people put there.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't know about a UBI in a country like Australia where we have existing and complex welfare systems in place, regardless of how many those systems have been de-funded, neglected, corporatised, privatised, dismantled etc. A UBI could be used to further weaken those systems and disadvantage more people.

We could certainly shorten the working day and the working week, introduce domestic labour income schemes, encourage more WFH (less travel from the burbs to the CBD) and so on. Basically anything that gives working people across all sectors more time to participate in fixing shit. I reckon most folks want to do more but they ain't got no time or energy after all that's required of them just to do all the work and family stuff they already do.

Edit: Forgot to mention, I think we could do with something like an 'Eco corp' but I dunno how that'd work and how it would be useful other than bringing folks together to work on fixing shit.

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago

If the welfare system had a living wage that allowed you to redirect into charity, conservation, social work, education, etc, then sure, this complex system can stay. The argument for a UBI (or similar) is that the complex system needs replacement because it wastes money and is not fit for the purpose we need.

Personally, I shortened my working week by choice and took the financial hit, I then redirect that spare time into environmental work. I ask people to jump in and help while I supply everything and they don't because they aren't getting paid. They have the time to help but only if they get money. People definitely have the time, there is a perverse incentive to do the right thing. I'm not sure how the welfare system can help with that as it stands.