this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
931 points (98.8% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3453 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Personally I think of she did something to deal with the absurd amounts of eco problems caused by her concerts and general mass flights she wouldn't really have any issues, at least that I'm aware of. As far as billionaires go, not bad.

One hell of an environmental impact though.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca -1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

To play devils advocate, if she needs to go somewhere for a concert, it’s not like she can just go to a normal airport like the rest of us. It would turn into an absolute frenzy and everyone would miss their flights.

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Nobody doesn't get that. To me, the point is she'd have to have a slower, smaller tour and apparently she wouldn't accept that.

There's no "needs to go somewhere".

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That doesn’t really solve the issue of literally millions of people wanting to see her perform. If she doesn’t go to them they will come to her, which obviously is not good for the environment either.

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol no dude. I didn't really have strong feelings about it, but give me a break.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Good talk 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)