US Law (local/state/federal)

83 readers

4 users here now

This is the only decentralized venue for chatter about law in the US. Federal law and law of various states and territories is on topic here.

Loosely related:

!humanrights@lemmy.sdf.org - covers UN-wide discussion on human rights

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org

What constitutional amendments should the US consider after learning a lesson from the second Trump presidency? (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org to c/law_us@lemmy.sdf.org

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The abuse of power, the lack of respect for our institutions, the rule by edict ... can those of us opposed to these create coherent rebuttals in the form of constitutional amendments that will address our time of crisis? What will these amendments say?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So clearly that doesn't help. Legislators refusing to form a government just means they should be replaced.

Replaced how? I mean they're the ones who decide whether they get replaced or not right?

I mean honestly how much of the House Representatives right now do you think could be called direct vassals of Donald Trump? How much has the house representative been completely tarnished by how US presidents have behaved in the last century? How much of their power have they surrendered willingly and for political reasons to the presidency? In ways in which the founding fathers never envisioned?

Fair enough.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Replaced by a new election. If you can't form a new government new elections are forced. It rarely gets that far, but it's happened.