UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1461 readers

1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

UAP whistleblower David Grusch, along with his lawyer Charles McCullough will be on BBC’s "The World Tonight" at 5:00PM EST (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

UAP whistleblower David Grusch, along with his lawyer Charles McCullough—who served as the original Intelligence Community Inspector General—will be featured on BBC’s "The World Tonight". The program is scheduled to air in less than an hour, at 5:00 PM Eastern Time.

Edit: Here is the interview for those that missed it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm unsure of the reasoning apart from what's been stated and don't want to speculate too much, but that could be a possibility, sure.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’ll speculate. They probably don’t want blowback on the law firm for representing kooky uap guy.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But they already represented him so that ship has sailed. I'd also argue 'kooky' would be an inappropriate descriptor for David Grusch, given his background and the people speaking on his behalf.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was thinking that’s how much of the public sees him.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Possibly. I'm honestly genuinely curious how much of the general public is aware of what's going on outside of "There was a public UAP hearing."

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They would just stop representing him. They could do so at any time.

This guy left a "height of his career" job to go out on his own to represent Grusch. I don't think you do that to protect the law firm.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You might if the Pentagon tells you to. Hope I’m wrong.