UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1461 readers

1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

Director of AARO, Sean Kirkpatrick, Issues a Statement Concerning the UAP Hearing (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In my opinion, this topic has crossed the Rubicon, and I’m presuming we won’t have to wait too long for answers or clarity one way or the other.

Unless there is no "there, there", which is still my betting position. Anything that can or has been revealed in a SCIF to members of Congress is probably already known by other people in government, specifically in the Pentagon and Executive Branch, or as Grusch mentioned (IIRC, could have been one of the other two guys) the Gang of Four may know more than the rest of Congress.

Unless I see compelling evidence to the contrary, the most likely and plausible explanation is that we're just seeing a repeat of history. Which means we probably won't actually know whatever cool tech is being occasionally glimpsed is for another few decades.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I'm interested in the whistleblower protections. I'm hopeful we'll get some information through them. I have my doubts in getting unclassified evidence of anything.

Whatever it is, if anything, Congress doesn't appear to be letting this go. We'll just have to see what happens.