this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
471 points (99.2% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3453 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 8 months ago (18 children)

This is more a mythology meme instead of a history meme though.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

As often said, no academic argues Jesus was not a historical figure. Only militant terminally online atheists do.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm not talking about whether Jesus existed or not. The bible is not a historic accord is what I'm saying.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Still, Simon/Peter could just as fine be as real as the person historically named Jesus. Assuming Jesus wasn't talking to imaginary friends all day.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 1 points 8 months ago

That’s not their point. Their point is the Bible isn’t a reliable source.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)