this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

529 readers
48 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. The bonkers-ness of the way he did this is really undersold by the headline. He "vetoed" particular parts of the sentence and individual digits out of particular numbers to assemble a whole new law that was totally different than the law that anyone had intended to pass. It's nuts. I have no idea why they decided it was okay.

[–] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Yep. Exactly. This is blatantly fucked up. I don't care how noble or good the cause.