this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
72 points (97.4% liked)

Ukraine

10361 readers
381 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Looking at the still frame https://sopuli.xyz/comment/16442567, the diameter of the mine is about the size of the soldier's combat boot. The MON-200 is about 43 cm, so too large and in my opinion too heavy for the way it's handled by the soldier. The MON-100 is too small, ~24 cm. In my eyes, the 32 cm sized TM-62 has the right dimension.

[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought it looked just like a TM-62 too, but the blast made me think again. I've seen those things go boom, I just can't believe that the cameraman could be walking after that.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Personally, I can't believe either someone is still walking after being like ~10 m next to an explosion of one of those mines. However, I assume it has a large impact on the force of the explosion, whether the mine is lying flat on the ground or "standing" on its lateral side.

[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

You may be right. My friend was trained as a sapper and he often talked about the importance of positioning the charges correctly. Even the simplest AT mines are designed to direct the most of the blast on the up-down - axis, to maximize the damage.

And like somebody already wrote, the cameraman could judt have been a dead man walking his final steps. The blast should have caused massive internal damage at that range. Maybe someone just salvaged the memory card of the camera/phone afterwards.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

More importantly, how did it go boom? Was it rigged to something to trigger it? Because those things won't go off even if you step on them.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

@Lorindol@sopuli.xyz

As the last still I could capture shows the flash coming from the left, it might actually be something else exploding than the three mines the soldier is dragging.

Screenshot

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's just rolling shutter from the camera. The sensor is blown out and the next frame is completely white it just starts capturing the data on that side.

Explosion could've happened anywhere in front of the camera for that to happen.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thanks for the clarification.

[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

That's a very good question.

I checked the specs of the TM-62, the standard fuze should require a pressure of 1500-5500N (150-550kg) to detonate. So the dragging should not have triggered it, unless the fuze was faulty - which would not be impossible considering the subpar quality of the Russian gear.