this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
48 points (91.4% liked)

Linux

7402 readers
401 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

because new shiny things are more secure than proven things

[–] kalipixel@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sudo had many vulnerabilities in past some of them unpached for years and it is bloated with unnecessary functionality that increases the attack surface. Doas is more secure and minimalist for example. Not an expert to say if Ubuntu approach is correct but I appreciate their effort.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i don't think sudo is perfect either but doas already exists, surely they could use that??

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ubuntu is a corporate/popular distro. It wouldn't make much sense to move to do as when it lacks much of the functionality of sudo and isnt in a memory safe language, which is Ubuntu's goal with replacing user space software with Rust.