this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

6455 readers
140 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Shawdow194@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Amazing how far the design... hasnt come ๐Ÿ’€

[โ€“] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But the tail rotor is horizontal?!

[โ€“] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[โ€“] eRac@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems a bit odd. The main rotor imparts an opposite spin on the body. Tha tail rotor is there to counteract that spin by blowing sideways. A horizontal one would have to use just its spin, not getting the benefit of the air mass being pushed sideways.

[โ€“] AtariDump@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That (chinook-style solution) only works if both rotors are the same size and speed.

Perhaps Sikorsky's tethers to the ground worked around the problem for that photo anyway. Not sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)