this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7392 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@kbin.social
PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
sga@lemmings.world
80
Vought-Sikorsky VS-300 helicopter in tethered flight, USA, 1939 (infosec.pub)
submitted 7 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/historyporn@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_citizen@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Sikorsky went through a long way. Hope I will drive one of it's descendants.

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Off to find a bit of the ole guzzalean. Cah chunk cah chunk!

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Amazing how far the design... hasnt come 💀

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But the tail rotor is horizontal?!

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why not?

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It seems a bit odd. The main rotor imparts an opposite spin on the body. Tha tail rotor is there to counteract that spin by blowing sideways. A horizontal one would have to use just its spin, not getting the benefit of the air mass being pushed sideways.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That (chinook-style solution) only works if both rotors are the same size and speed.

Perhaps Sikorsky's tethers to the ground worked around the problem for that photo anyway. Not sure.