this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
354 points (97.3% liked)
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social
1101 readers
1 users here now
COMM HAS MOVED TO !tankiejerk@piefed.social
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"Destroying a nation" does not inherently mean "genocide".
That was the historic norm. If you lost a war, you ended up under the flag of the conquering country and were expected to adopt at least some aspects of their culture. But in general, much of the civilian population survived. A thousand states vanished from Europe in the last millenium, but only a handful of times did it result in their entire populations being slaughtered/displaced.
I suspect much of the time, it was more valuable to have more subjects than a lot of empty land with nobody to work it. Not like Russia has that problem already...
Actually yeah, that’s genocide and history is full of it.
Enough that something is wrong with you if you don’t feel a little gross being a human who’s ok with continuing it, and deciding to do whatever you can to encourage breaking the cycle.