this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
412 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

11096 readers
244 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (16 children)

... Ok, that is legitimately impressive, from a technical standpoint.

Lua is a high level, not exactly very 'fast', very performant language. It is designed to be very, very human readable, and coding noob friendly.

Getting a 3D physics engine to work ... in lua... is not something I would have thought possible.

Usually you need to use a much lower level language to ... actually do that.

EDIT:

A few other commenters have now pointed out that this is actually using LuaJIT... which passes Lua code to a C compiler, quickly translates and then compiles in C, and then runs in C.

So, that makes much more sense, its functionally running in C, a lower level, compiled code language.

Still impressive nonetheless!

[–] PlexSheep 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Lua is pretty fast actually, though I don't know how it compares to compiled speed.

[–] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Lua can be very fast using LuaJIT or similar

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)