this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38704 readers
137 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (10 children)

it seems a bit disingenuous to call these “data centers in space” or “super computers”.

30 terabytes of storage across 12 satellites? So 2.5 TB each and 744 tops (which is like, a modern mid range graphics card for a PC, the RX 9070 XT does 1557 tops for reference). Like that just sounds like they’re launching a powerful PC in to orbit. Like, that’s a lot of power for a satellite, for comparison the curiosity rover is using the same kind of CPU as a 2000 era imac G3, but it’s not a data center.

The idea of doing more processing of the data on the satellite rather than processing it on the ground is interesting and neat, but representing these as anything more than that is… weird.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (5 children)

12 of 2800 planned have been launched.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That’s still not very much compared to most data centers. Like, 7000 terabytes is a lot of storage for one person, but it barely even registers compared to most modern data centers.

Also, 2800 desktops networked together isn’t really a super computer or a data center.

such a network is interesting as a scientific tool for gathering and processing data, certainly, but not a data-center and not a super computer.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

But being accurate with the headline makes it less click baity. 😏 Honestly, this article is scant on details.

Data centers don't usually have an "X-ray polarization detector for picking up brief cosmic phenomena." Like you said, it seems more like a scientific tool than an actual "data center."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)