this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
430 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

70268 readers
3384 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In 2012, Palantir quietly embedded itself into the daily operations of the New Orleans Police Department. There were no public announcements. No contracts made available to the city council. Instead, the surveillance company partnered with a local nonprofit to sidestep oversight, gaining access to years of arrest records, licenses, addresses, and phone numbers all to build a shadowy predictive policing program.

Palantir’s software mapped webs of human relationships, assigned residents algorithmic “risk scores,” and helped police generate “target lists” all without public knowledge. “We very much like to not be publicly known,” a Palantir engineer wrote in an internal email later obtained by The Verge.

After years spent quietly powering surveillance systems for police departments and federal agencies, the company has rebranded itself as a frontier AI firm, selling machine learning platforms designed for military dominance and geopolitical control.

"AI is not a toy. It is a weapon,” said CEO Alex Karp. “It will be used to kill people.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kcweller@feddit.nl -2 points 4 days ago (9 children)

The Orwell fans are awfully quiet.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I just don't feel like responding because it would take some effort to refute all of that. I think anyone who does even half a decent amount of research will quickly realize that it's either simply wrong or cherry picking. It's pointless anyway to try to convince people who are so entrenched in their opinions.

But hey, it's good to know that people are impressed just by mentioning a few random sources.

You'd be better off reading the Wikipedia article about Orwell instead of forming an opinion based on random social media comments.

[–] kcweller@feddit.nl -1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Great job making a case for the people who don't actually do any research or due diligence but just drop a "read the wiki" 😂

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Smugfaceman: "I posted le wall of text of random dubious sources, get rekt libtards"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)