this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
118 points (95.4% liked)
memes
15502 readers
3191 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
fascinating. So you've replaced the capacitor with a series of smaller capacitors?
Yea, you put capacitors in ~~series~~ parallel when you need to pool the capacitance capacity, put them in ~~parallel~~ series when you need to boost the voltage (at the sacrifice of capacity)
Edit, backwards
It's the other way around. Parallel capacitors boost capacitance to the sum of the individuals. It's like increasing the plates' area. Serial connected capacitors do the reverse: decreased capacitance with greater breakdown voltage, like the dielectric's thickness is increased.
Lol I thought I had it backwards