this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
225 points (98.3% liked)

News

30326 readers
2469 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Delaware animal shelter is working to find new homes for thousands of chicks that were left abandoned in a U.S. Postal Service truck for three days.

Delaware's Department of Agriculture said it received a call earlier this month from USPS saying the Postal Service had an "undeliverable box of baby birds." About 12,000 chicks had been shipped from the Pennsylvania-based Freedom Ranger Hatchery to farms across the country.

State agricultural officials say that when they found the chicks at a USPS distribution center in Delaware, around 4,000 were dead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

You can't have smugness in such a short and concise comment. I jave no idea what intention was in the writer's mind and neither do you.

Left field? This situation is a direct result of the animal products industry. Sure this comment is looking at the bigger picture, but it is very much on topic.

And you know what? even if it was smug, while not the best way to make a point, i think that when your point is valid the smugness is negligible.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

You absolutely can have smugness even with a single word given the context, and Lemmy and society at large have provided plenty of context in the form of a questionable activism and social trends & attitudes and drama. Given this, I can deduce some things, it's not so out of reach.

And besides, arguing my opinions on why I downvoted someone doesn't seem as important to me as addressing the extremely inaccurate take by the other guy.

when your point is valid the smugness is negligible

I wish that were true. I can't count the times people have ignored reason because I was slightly smug to someone in that same sentence 😅

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Their weird rationalization for why people are downvoting the vegan comment. I agree with its sentiment but not its delivery is my point, as a counter example to their reasoning bias.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I personally don't think that there is enough text in that comment to accurately decide if it was smug or not, but even if you believe that it was smug, I'm not gonna tell you you're wrong, but if you agree that the point is correct and you're only downvoting it because of how it was worded, I think you're doing more damage to the Lemmy community than you're doing good, since even if it is a smug comment it is not overtly smug, it is not disrespectful, and the point is valid and very important considering that animal lives are already overlooked and undervalued.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

you’re only downvoting it because of how it was worded

Yeah, and it's tied to what I said earlier. There was some thought behind it lol

I think you’re doing more damage to the Lemmy community

Let's not. I sincerely did not vote either way because I also agree with the sentiment, but I commented as if I had (down) voted because of the friction it creates in my mind. We don't need to go around arbitrarily assigning blame.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)