this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
710 points (96.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

23402 readers
1567 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 97 points 8 hours ago (21 children)

I also hate the way "algorithm" has taken over the public consciousness. You can find people unironically saying "I don't want any algorithm in my social media feed", which is a nonsensical statement.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 37 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

People are onto something though - there's been a noticeable shift from social media just showing you your feed in a chronological manner to it showing you personally tailored content that shuffles on each refresh and aims to hook you into endless doomscrolling. I understand perfectly well what's an algorithm, but good luck explaining to people that it's not that specific thing.

[–] andioop@programming.dev 14 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Some people actively desire this kind of algorithm because they find it easier to find content they like this way. I'm not sure if they are immune to doomscrolling and actually have gotten it to work in a way that serves them and doesn't involve doomscrolling, or if they are doomscrolling and okay with it. But for me, I really wish I could go back to the chronological feed era.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago

It tends to be hit or miss.

When I started using Odysee instead of YouTube, my page was full of "women vs men", woke culture and onlyfans-esque videos.
I realised, subscribing to a creator actually made a big difference in this case, to get them on you page, because it's not a feed (controlled by an algo), but a simple, categorised list, with the "Following" on top.

In contrast to that, the YouTube's algorithm tended to create relations between videos (using who knows how many criteria) and showed them along with videos from the subscribed and more-often-viewed channels. It used to show some pretty useful results and it would be a crime for me to downplay its usefulness.

Sadly, by the time I left YouTube, it had started putting the doomscroll content on my page, which is probably another reason for why I stopped using it.

I would call it: Another great mechanism, ruined by capitalism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)