this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38692 readers
297 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This week, the company reportedly attempted to delay, derail, and manipulate reviews of its $299 GeForce RTX 5060 graphics card, which would normally be its bestselling GPU of the generation. Nvidia has repeatedly and publicly said the budget 60-series cards are its most popular, and this year it reportedly tried to ensure it by withholding access and pressuring reviewers to paint them in the best light possible.

Here are the tactics that Nvidia reportedly just used to throw us off the 5060's true scent, as individually described by GamersNexus, VideoCardz, Hardware Unboxed, GameStar.de, Digital Foundry, and more:

  • Nvidia decided to launch its RTX 5060 on May 19th, when most reviewers would be at Computex in Taipei, Taiwan, rather than at their test beds at home.
  • Even if reviewers already had a GPU in hand before then, Nvidia cut off most reviewers' ability to test the RTX 5060 before May 19th by refusing to provide drivers until the card went on sale. (Gaming GPUs don't really work without them.)
  • And yet Nvidia allowed specific, cherry-picked reviewers to have early drivers anyhow if they agreed to a borderline unethical deal: they could only test five specific games, at 1080p resolution, with fixed graphics settings, against two weaker GPUs (the 3060 and 2060 Super) where the new card would be sure to win.
  • In some cases, Nvidia threatened to withhold future access unless reviewers published apples-to-oranges benchmark charts showing how the RTX 5060's "fake frames" MFG tech can produce more frames than earlier GPUs without it.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 18 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Disgusting.

This would be sad and highly unethical if coming from some small, relatively new company, struggling to keep up. But since it's coming from a large, monopolistic and 30yo old corporation it becomes way worse.

I'm glad I stopped buying their cards. My last one is an AMD, and I'm going Chinese for the next one (a decade or so from now).

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 13 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

Love my 9070. Nvidia can get bent their prices are fucking nuts. Absolutely do not understand why anyone would pay $1000+ for their cards

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

To some extent it comes down to nvidia’s software. Like, some people like their upscaling, and I’ve heard from streamers that they need them for NVENC.

On the other hand, their Linux drivers are an pain and they’ve been less than cooperative on that front in the past.

and they’ve been less than cooperative on that front in the past.

They've been getting a lot better after hiring that one guy to work on their open source drivers. I'm curious how good they're going to be in a year or so.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)