Funny

10367 readers

754 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

854

It aint that hard, fuck wits (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 month ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

204 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HeurtisticAlgorithm9@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Assuming binary options of cautiousness (either you can be cautious or not) and only one being correct, 'being cautious is correct' is equivalent to NOT 'being cautious is incorrect'. Which is what I said.

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

It's not a binary option. It's a spectrum. You need to be cautious while driving, which is correct. You CAN be TOO cautious, which is in itself incorrect.

Stop being a pedant.