this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

Degrowth

1221 readers
1 users here now

Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I strongly disagree with one of the core arguments of the article. The article describes "concentric circles of caring" - a person caring more about friends than acquaintances than compatriots than others. It then characterizes top-down action as trying to change from the outside in while bottom-up changes from the inside out.

This seems very clearly false. There are many top-down initiatives, like national welfare plans or child support subsidies, that try to work from the inside out. And there are many bottom-up initiatives, like veganism or supporting undocumented refugees, that try to work from the outside in.

As such, the question of outside in and/or inside out bears no relation to top-down or bottom-up. The conclusion of plurality of tactics remains intact, but only because it is the best position in a zero information scenario. (aka: throw spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks).

[โ€“] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

There are many top-down initiatives, like national welfare plans or child support subsidies, that try to work from the inside out.

national

inside-out

...