this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
1719 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7911 readers
2483 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I'm not disagreeing with this necessarily, but I don't like seeing a post by an account I have no idea about stating something as scientific fact, and then having that post taken as fact point blank. Once again, not trying to say what she is saying is incorrect, I just get concerned when I see bandwagoning on some random person's take.

That said, if you find the studies on this, please please please do us all a favor and comment those!

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Here's a decent meta-analysis you can start with.

Sixteen reviews met the inclusion criteria. The reviews were comprised of nine peer-reviewed articles and reports from systematic review databases, five technical reports, and two working papers. Table 1 shows the reviews organized by objectives and geography

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Awesome, love this.

I wish this was the post or at least linked.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)