U.S. News

2411 readers

2 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
Advocating violence is not allowed on Beehaw in general.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Powderhorn@beehaw.org

In Texas, insurers are watching your home from above. It could cost you coverage. (www.kut.org)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tracy Gartenmann had no idea the company that insured her home against wildfires, hailstorms and high winds was also spying on her.

Until she got an email.

In January, a representative for Travelers Insurance emailed Gartenmann to say the company would not renew the policy she’d had on her home in Austin for more than a decade.

Trees had edged too close to her roof, a company representative said, endangering the home. How did they know? Attached to the email were two photos from above Gartenmann’s house. The representative said they had gotten the sky-high images from a third-party company.

“I thought it was a scam,” said Gartenmann. Once she realized the email was real, her reaction changed: “It felt like an infringement on my rights.”

KUT News spoke with homeowners, industry experts and insurance watchdogs, and reviewed hundreds of pages of complaints and state filings. Documents obtained through public records requests confirm that insurers in Texas are using aerial photos taken by satellites and aircraft to determine if they want to keep insuring homes.

Prescient story to run into just after the strongest storm I've ever experienced rolled through. Thankfully, the warned 3" hail turned out to be marble sized where I'm parked. But the rain was absolutely insane, and 60mph winds in a van isn't fun.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dinren@discuss.online 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t see the problem. Sure, it’s a bit creepy, but they have the right to see what they are insuring.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which can be done without a method that produces false positives on reasons to terminate coverage. Part of the premium is them doing due diligence. Satellite photos are not that.

Sure, come inspect the house once a year. I've no issue with that. Some sort of "AI" deciding it doesn't like your roof from a photo? Yeah, no.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

They should be required to do an in-person inspection before rescinding coverage. Then, they could use AI to decide where the inspection isn't needed, saving money... but of course they're greedy and don't want to do that.