this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
1114 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

7979 readers
2627 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 167 points 1 week ago (31 children)

Modern UI designers don’t have a fucking clue.

You’d think the first principle would be “don’t break the existing fucking UI”, but no.

Infinite scroll. Windows without toolbars. Replacing context menu with useless site-specific one. Forcing links to open in new or same tab, depriving the user of choice. Blocking text select. Blocking copy, as if that’s somehow going to stop people from stealing your shitty content. Fucking with the browser history.

And then there’s the constant reinventing of the wheel. How many times do we need to implement a fucking checkbox?

No lie, I’ve actually had designers come to me with a concept for “a visual indicator that shows the user how they are progressing through the page”.

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What's wrong with infinite scroll?

[–] qupada@fedia.io 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As it's most often seen on news sites - where scrolling too far gives you another article - a handful of reasons.

One: there are frequently still links (think "about us" / "contact us" kind of pages) in the footer that you might need to access, which you can invariably now never reach, because as soon as they're in view they're replaced by more content.

Two: as the parent poster so accurately put it, "fucking with the browser history". It becomes entirely indeterminate whether the back button now returns to the previous site, or just goes back by one piece of content.

Three: the new content is almost certainly unrelated to the page I started on, and not of any interest to me.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

This was just happening to me with Amazon. I wanted to get to the support link in the footer but they always loaded new stuff before I could click on it

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago
  • You want to navigate somewhere then navigate back? Haha, no.
  • If it's not implemented properly, resources (images, videos, ads) don't get unloaded when they're no longer visible.
  • Some fuckwit wannabe designers actually put the footer UNDER infinite scrolling pages.
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Breaks the scroll bar, for starters.

[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you're dragging the scrollbar down, the page suddenly loads new content and you're lost.

When you're going through a long page and you want to come back to it later, you can't come back to where you left.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago

Plus if you want to find older content, you can't just skip to a page, you need to scroll through every goddamn item until you find what you're looking for.

load more comments (26 replies)