Antifascism

805 readers

1 users here now

A community to post acts of antifascism and other left-wing activism. Please message a mod if you would like something posted and we can tag you in the post as well.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seahorse@midwest.social

exposingfash@midwest.social

280

"and then they came for the socialists" (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 month ago by seahorse@midwest.social to c/antifascism@midwest.social

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A subpoena is a court order. Courts do not equal Congress. Separation of powers, and all that.

Edit: To clarify, courts don't issue subpoenas, they sign off on them. Because this hasn't been issued as a subpoena or signed off on by a court, it's not a subpoena and cannot be construed as one. At least, within the bounds of the law. Which as we've seen don't really matter at the moment.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

~~Congress can absolutely issue subpoenas itself. Courts can rule on the legality, but they do not have to issue them on behalf of congress.~~ ty for the edit I see what you meant now.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I realised my comment was woefully undercooked shortly after posting it 😅 It's worth noting though that issuance isn't the standard to be met; if the court doesn't sign off on a subpoena, it's not legally a subpoena and can't be enforced regardless of who issued it.