this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
413 points (98.1% liked)
memes
15845 readers
3488 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I cannot relate to feet and inches for height, I'm all but used to imperial units.
All I am saying though is that 1.68 is very small from my perspective and if that's the average height back around 1800, people where tiny then.
I edited my post to include metric units for those numbers.
And sure, it's fine to say that is short from your own personal perspective but yes statistically the average height was less back then. Even so the average height today is only about 10 cm more.
You may just be taller than average if you are that incredulous about his height. I don't consider 5'5" (1.68 m) to be that far off from the average height of men in most countries today. If he were under say 5' (1.52 m) I would say that is significantly shorter.
You're taking this far more serious than I do.
Also, ten centimetres are a lot in height difference.