this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
694 points (90.4% liked)

memes

15826 readers
3050 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because shade works in 3D and it's not clear how far away the background is from this picture. But yes, 'dress shaped and size amounts of shade' exist; trees, could be on a shaded balcony, etc.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm just an elevated being but I can clearly tell that the righthand side is a mirror on a wall and that the tan below it is where the floor meets the wall. Because of that, I can roughly make out the angle and know that we should be seeing some shade on the side if any existed in the first place.

Does that make sense?

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No because it's your subconscious, otherwise you'd have no problem understanding why it's was ambigious. (Same applies for elevated beings - they can grasp differences in human colour perception).

And either way, even if your assumptions were true you still don't know the angle of the sun, potential coverings, etc. You can't predict the shade without that info so the logical choice would be to use the colours the pixels display.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The potential coverings would have to be exactly the shape of the dress because of the sleeves, no? We would see the shade passing underneath? Like onto the obvious clothing rack underneath the left sleeve?

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No because you can't see the floor underneath.

Looks like a fence with holes in it to the left, can see the sun through the holes in the distance.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Interesting.

Anyway, skill diff! See ya!