this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
164 points (91.4% liked)

linuxmemes

26049 readers
356 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 105 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    xtrans is a real repo for the xorg thing, they changed the icon for it to a trans flag.

    [–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 103 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Holy based, especially after that cringe "anti-dei" x11libre fork with all the nazis.

    [–] rt3_m0@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Any context on this. I wasn't able to keep up with the news. X11libre has nazis?

    [–] exu@feditown.com 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    Go read the first few paragraphs of the XLibre repo. For additional context, the gux was roasted by Linus for spreading anti-vax and other shot years ago.

    [–] meekah@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I just did. The first two seem alright, and seem like they're just a rant of someone who is seriously fed up at big tech.

    The breaking point for me was the last part in the 3rd paragraph:

    It's explicitly free of any "DEI" or similar discriminatory policies.

    [–] rt3_m0@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I looked at it (here is the link for lazy people https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver ) and from the first couple of paragraphs it looks anti DEI although I don't see how that is bad or how that releates to nazis but they do not apear to be nazis. (Sorry for the bad English not a native.)

    [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    The lead maintainer is an anti-vaxxer, conspiracy theorist, historical revisionist, and general nutjob. Links in the comments: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/38376251

    The entire "non-ideological" thing is just him not wanting to be challenged for being a shitter.

    [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    In the US, "anti-DEI" is nothing but thinly-veiled discrimination. It is used primarily by people with the skills, personality, and sociability of a slice microwaved Wonderbread who need something to hide behind to avoid taking responsibility for their failings as well as by literal neo-nazis to try out a facade of legitimacy for their discriminatory actions while signalling their socio-political stance to their fellow neo-nazis.

    DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. It's meaning is approximately:

    Diversity - Efforts should be made to ensure diverse representation in the workplace, especially for groups that have historically suffered from discrimination. To this end, when skills and capabilities are approximately equal, those from groups that have suffered oppression should be favored. This both strengthens the workplace by adding different perspectives and helps to "rebalance" to correct for centuries of discrimination that have robbed these groups of opportunities.

    A diverse workplace is stronger and more effective than a homogenous one, as proven by extensive sociological research.

    Equity - People are different and may need assistance to put them on equal footing when they are otherwise equally capable to those who have greater societal representation. This could be as simple as ensuring that someone who needs glasses to read without eye strain is able to readily able to get them. Or it could mean ensuring that someone who has gender dysphoria (which can cause extraordinary mental health problems like anxiety and treatment-resistant major depression) is able to get the treatment that they need.

    Inclusion - This is about the simplest of the three. Everyone should feel safe and valid in the workplace, regardless of their immutable characteristics.

    When people say that they are "anti-DEI" in the US, they mean that they want a society where the only people with power are white, protestant men. They want a society where white, protestant men are favored over other all other groups and considered the "default" choice for anything. And they want a society where people who are different from them are afraid to participate because they may be arbitrarily punished and/or lynched.

    When they claim that DEI is discriminatory and that they oppose discrimination, they are lying. Being forced to actually compete with others on even ground is terrifying to them and not being held above everyone else makes them think they are being oppressed.

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

    When people say that they are β€œanti-DEI” in the US, they mean that they want a society where the only people with power are white, protestant men.

    Source: trust me bro

    Is it really that implausible that some people really do just want to have diversity, inclusion, and equity the "old way" by simply giving everyone an equal opportunity to participate instead of embracing DEI ideology? It's a huge leap in logic to just assume that anyone who doesn't subscribe to some specific ideology that claims to be tolerant must secretly be opposed to tolerance itself. I think all of those people yelling "nazi" at anyone remotely critical of DEI are just projecting.

    [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    Ah yes. "Equal opportunities" of the old days, like being told to be out of town by sunset or you'll be lynched, or firing women who get pregnant, or redlining neighborhoods and adding restrictions too deeds to prevent the "wrong sort" of people (aka anyone not white) from moving in.

    "DEI Ideology" is a made-up boogie man that the far-right created as an excuse to discriminate against minorities and their allies, since being outright racist isn't acceptable anymore. White conservatives are terrified of meritocracy.

    [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

    @nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org @renzev@lemmy.world

    Chill it.

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

    Huh? How did you go from "people should have equal opportunities" to lynching and firing pregnant women? At this point you're just saying whatever you want.

    Plus, lmao at the hypocrisy of calling DEI a "boogeyman" while simultaneously accusing anyone disagreeing with you a racistsexistlyncher. It's totally real, you're proving it yourself.

    [–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I don't know if the creators are nazis, however, there was an issue questioning the inclusion of the DEI statement, and in that thread there were several uses of antisemitic dog whistles, including (((echoes))). These had a positive like/dislike ratio.

    Edit: After looking through their repo these comments have been removed.

    [–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    What is the future of X.org if all the mainstream distros drop X11 for Wayland?

    Any other projects we should know about?

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

    X11 is used in Xwayland

    It is maintained by the same people and is on life support. It has been that way for a decade

    [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    What is the future of X.org if all the mainstream distros drop X11 for Wayland?

    Retirement to the archives. The protocol is extremely dated and held together with duct tape. The maintainers are mostly also contributors to Wayland projects, where they are implementing features impossible with X11.

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

    I question whether the people hollering that "X11 is held together with duct tape" have actually tried using X11 in the recent years. It's surprisingly stable. You never have to fiddle with Xorg.conf anymore, it's all automatic. The only parts where it really shits the bed, in my experience, is either if you're trying some extremely non-standard setup like mixing and matching wildly different generations of graphics cards, or in cases of deliberate sabotage by gn*me devs like client-side decorations and shadows. I really wished that the X11 -> wayland transition would be just like the pulseaudio -> pipewire transition where a desperately broken system that was causing issues for users got replaced -- in a matter of months -- with a successor that was not only 100% compatible but offered cool new features on top of stability improvements. But this has just not been the case so far. Wayland has been "the future of the linux desktop" for nearly twenty years, and it's still not quite there yet. X11 mostly just works, it isn't abandoned, it's finished. And what exactly are the new features we should be looking forward to in wayland? Isolation between clients is very cool I must confess, but did it really necessitate an entire protocol overhaul? QubesOS has had that feature working under X11 for over a decade. This guy on github managed to get it working with off-the-shelf X11 tunneling tools. Nevertheless, I'm still optimistic for wayland. The already existing backwards compatibility with X11 is impressive, and I think with enough work it might just be viable as the successor.