this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1589 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

12754 readers
49 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nobody is arguing that technology won’t progress. Even Marx defends that as a precondition for socialism/communism.

The question is the following. Tomorrow a ground breaking technology is developed that makes literally everyone twice as productive. (Please let’s ignore the technical aspect of this. I’m simplifying for the sake of the argument, but this is happening at some paces everywhere).

Now you have 3 options:

  1. Everyone can just work half the time for the same productivity. I.e. the economy can sustain itself with people just working less (which is a MAJOR quality of life increase).
  2. Everyone works the same amount of time but their salaries double.
  3. Everyone works the same amount of time. Their salaries increase a small %, perhaps keeping up with inflation, perhaps a tiny bit more than that, sometimes even not keeping up with inflation. The added productivity results in increased wealth aggregation at the top.

Number 1 is what people are talking about in this thread.

Number 2 won’t happen because salaries aren’t actually tied to productivity. Productivity just sets a higher limit on salary that in any case is never reached. The salaries are actually determined by competition between workers.

Number 3. Has been happening since the seventies and will continue to happen.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But we're talking about different things though. I don't disagree with the notion that the work week should decrease or that people should get more based on their production. We're in total agreement here. I'm arguing that automation is going to bring about the apocalypse like the person I replied to implied because history shows us that this wasn't the case when similar situations arose in the past. Technology does progress, the economy does evolve, old jobs and industries do die out, and people do lose their jobs because of it. But what is also true at the same time is that new jobs and industries do get created because of the new technology, and the people who lose their jobs do adapt and end up getting new roles that utilize their skill sets. People who get laid off don't become forever useless, people aren't that rigid.

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes new jobs will be created but more and more wealth is concentrated at the top

It’s not the apocalypse but it’s also not not bad in many ways.

Technological progress should only be a good thing but in a capitalist society like ours it has a lot of downsides too (for the majority of the population ofc)

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

But this isn't an issue of technology or economic progress, but of politics. These are two different discussions. Jobs being automated away isn't new nor is it going away. It's simply a part of the evolution of economies. The issues we have stem from a flawed political system that's not doing it's job.

For our system to work as intended, we need to have a robust democratically elected government that proactively regulates the economy on the behalf of the people to protect consumers, the environment, and the health of the economy. This is one of the fingers of the invisible hand. A government is supposed to break up monopolies, ban deceptive and predatory practices, protect consumers from harmful products, make sure that businesses don't pollute the environment, protect workers from exploitation, and so on. In other capitalist countries like Sweden, Germany, and Ireland they have this, we don't... at least not anymore.

The reason for this is because there's no accountability in our government anymore. No politician faces any consequences no matter the crime or controversy. Our public officials no longer fear the public, and this type of unchecked power allows them to be corrupt because they know they can get away with it. They have lost any incentive to do their job of holding bad actors in the country accountable and instead started doing their bidding (like endless deregulation and tax cuts for the rich). That's the root of our issue, and blaming AI for it is just silly.

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

First I’m not from the US

Second, yes ofc it’s politics. Nobody is disagreeing on that.

Third even in Europe this is becoming a problem even if the inequality gap doesn’t grow as fast

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree that we've been doing number 3 for decades. Sooner or later that has to lead to a revolution though right?

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Supposedly

But things need to become real bad