this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
457 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

8715 readers
1791 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s not what that says. It says:

Trouble is, trials are rare. About 94 percent of felony convictions at the state level and about 97 percent at the federal level are the result of plea bargains.

Plea bargains are due process. In order to expedite them, prosecutors throw the kitchen sink at every case so that IF you go to trial you’re “looking at” 30 years to life without parole for bumping into a cop. The plea, then, is misdemeanor jaywalking, $1000 fine, six months probation and you sleep at home tonight.

Yeah, its fucked up, many parts of it. But that doesn’t deny what the OP image is saying. Saying 90% of trials don’t get due process is incorrect. Firstly, because trials are essentially the definition of due process, but also the link (which is very good) does not say that.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The core of our disagreement is this:

Plea bargains are due process.

They are not, they exist solely and explicitly to circumvent the "due process of law" particularly the 6th and 7th amendments.

prosecutors throw the kitchen sink at every case

Yes, and the fact that isn't viewed as the blatant coercion it is, and a blatant violation of the 5th amendment, is part of the problem.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are not, they exist solely and explicitly to circumvent the "due process of law" particularly the 6th and 7th amendments.

How does a plea bargain remove the defendant's right to legal counsel or a trial? It does neither of those things. Yes, it's used erroneously by prosecutors and that's a huge problem, but the accused gets counsel even if they can't pay for it and the trial is always an option.

If you're saying plea bargains are designed to intimidate people into not going to trial, yes that's true, but that's not the same thing as circumventing an amendment. That's not the same thing at all.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

De jure vs de facto. From the standpoint of a legal fiction you're not wrong, however an option made under duress isn't really an option.

Do you also argue that homelessness doesn't exist due to squatters rights?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No. Plea bargains are due process. It is far from perfect, ideal, or even good. But the seventh amendment isn't a novel-sized book, so they left some things to our society's interpretation, and we're fucking it up bigly.