this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
215 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
2078 readers
95 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For reference, the "Hopeless Dipshit Percentage" in any population is about 25-33%.
About a quarter to a third of the population believes in witches, ghosts and ESP; that the earth revolves around the sun; that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11; that Obama was born in Kenya; and that evolution and climate change are hoaxes. A third of the US population can't name a single right guaranteed by the constitution or even one branch of government. And a quarter of the population self-professes that they wouldn't stop supporting Trump no matter what he did.
In that context, only 3% willing to pay any money for AI is an utter failure. The LLM bubble needs to burst yesterday, and the whole Internet needs to roll back to 2022.
@salacious_coaster @dgerard Wait till you learn the percentage of ostensibly fully functional adults that have an Invisible Friend in the Sky
Yeah but that particular lunacy is grandfathered in to society, so I avoid it in my rants
I don't know how true this still holds but two years after 9/11 70% of the US thought Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11. My guess is that number continues to be higher than 30%.
@salacious_coaster I believe that the root cause of the critically important problem that you are highlighting, is the widespread idea that "faith" -- that is, belief without evidence -- is a virtue.
It is not.
I'm really hoping it's a slipup that you included the Earth revolving around the sun in the list of crazy, there's quite good evidence for heliocentrism!
Yep, that was a mistake, thanks for catching
I would far prefer the rollback to be 2004 or earlier...
I mean, "ideally" (to AI companies) those 3% would be the people who use it the most, so businesses and employees who get real value out of the stuff. Depending on who are considered AI users, it's not awful as a B2B thing. Selling to the general public is definitely a no-go though.
I have really bad news about what percentage that would be
I mean, (some) programmers at least do find the stuff helpful, so it's not 0.
"businesses and employees"
the business pays for it, the employees "use" it.
the business measures the value by how many employees they can remove.
if the business is measuring "productivity", how are they doing that? Is it jira tickets? Is it timesheets? are they measuring quality? Is it starting to seem like you're trying to pick up water with your fingers?
if you pretend that ai ceos are actually doing marketing the trajectory is right there staring you in the face
I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make is.
we hope you find a more suitable Lemmy community to post to.
3% of the population being scammers sounds about right.