this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
9 points (80.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
303 readers
9 users here now
Ask Lemmy community on sh.itjust.works. Ask us anything you feel like asking, just make sure it's respectful of others and follows the instance rules.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The term “beggar” carries significant social, historical, and ethical baggage, and using it can raise several concerns, especially in contemporary discussions around poverty, homelessness, and social justice.
Dehumanization and Reductionism
Concern: The term defines a person solely by their economic condition or behavior, rather than as a complex individual.
Example: Saying “a beggar” instead of “a person who is unhoused and asking for help” reduces their identity to a single desperate act, often erasing context like trauma, systemic failure, or disability.
Stigmatization and Shame
Concern: “Beggar” has strong negative connotations, often associated with laziness, fraud, or failure, regardless of the reality.
Social impact: This contributes to public hostility or apathy toward people experiencing poverty, reinforcing stereotypes that they are undeserving of compassion or aid.
Historical and Cultural Bias
Concern: In many cultures, “begging” has been treated as morally suspect or even criminal. In some legal systems, "vagrancy" laws were used to target marginalized communities.
Implication: Using the term today without awareness of this history can echo punitive or classist attitudes.
Lack of Structural Awareness
Concern: The term “beggar” often implies personal failure, obscuring systemic issues like:
Result: It discourages deeper reflection or policy solutions by framing poverty as an individual problem.
Alternative Language and Framing
Many prefer phrases like:
These terms are person-first and focus on circumstances rather than character judgment.
Summary
Using “beggar” can be perceived as outdated, pejorative, and lacking empathy. In thoughtful or inclusive contexts—especially academic, activist, or journalistic—it is generally advised to choose language that centers the humanity and complexity of individuals rather than casting them as social burdens.