this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
303 points (98.4% liked)

Progressive Politics

3004 readers
49 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 78 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If 'the blacks' have removed power from the n-word, then why can the hosts still not say it? Is it because words do still hold powerful meaning and it's the context that gives it that meaning? And that there is still no context in which the word Nazi can be reclaimed in the same way racial slurs have been?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nazis were clearly the victim of an anti-Nazi agenda.

Also the way he says the blacks at 0:12 is... interesting...

[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Nazis are the real victims in all of this, clearly.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It wouldn't even make sense to say "reclaim" because it's not like the meaning of "Nazi" ever changed. It means what it's always meant and will likely always meant; it's just that what it means is fucking abhorrent so people don't tend to want to be described by it.

[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Seems like the hope is to dilute it down, so that it doesn't have the same impact. Which may or may not work with the base, but I'm reasonably confident a majority of people will never not see Nazism as a super bad thing.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

more than not its trying to normalize the word "nazi" so it doesnt mean anything.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

also because a white person is saying the n-word too.