this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
618 points (97.1% liked)

Comic Strips

18380 readers
2247 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The commercial robot would be put to use for you, and you would get a percent from it. The purpose is for you to "own" the Robot, specifically so certain people can't complain about having their taxes/labor stolen.

You can't get more in order to prevent corruption.

The personal use Robots are just there to do stuff for you, but you can't use them to get money.

[–] S0ck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That sounds like an interesting novel or movie, but utterly impractical in the real world.

Entirely too easy to game, or imagine a scenario where several generations after it's implementation, "high producing" robot jobs are inherited, creating a permanent upper class and a permanent lower class, because the only jobs that EVERYONE has access to are the jobs that will break your robot, and your bank.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's essentially not different than the current situation from an exploitability aspect.

Currently every human being owns one "commercial robot", aka their body. Theoretically this means that labor is distributed: Every person can perform the work of one person.

But that doesn't stop capitalism to exploit that labor unfairly. A worker earning a company €1, gets only a very small fraction of that money.

That's literally the system we have now.

And we aren't even getting into what kind of robot one owns and that these robots perform wildly different depending on the task at hand (factory robot, vacuum cleaner robot, anything in between, ...)

[–] S0ck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It’s essentially not different than the current situation from an exploitability aspect.

That's why it sucks, man.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)