this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
924 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

7731 readers
453 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
924
Satire is indistinguishable from stupidity (infosec.pub)
submitted 2 days ago by axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
248 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://nitter.net/MrPitbull07/status/1940063945945227383#m

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And what, leave the apartments empty? Have them earn zero money, rather than some money?

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

public ownership with rents based on the costs of maintaining the properties properly

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

That is actually a far better idea than rent control, yes.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As per my other replies, typically sell the property to an owner-occupier, which is a big problem if you can't afford to buy a property.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

A run of market sales would drive down the price.

And if you can't afford to rent, then got being able to buy is not a significant difference.