this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
84 points (90.4% liked)

movies

1205 readers
206 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

We asked The Atlantic’s writers and editors: What’s a film adaptation that’s better than the book?

The article explains why they consider the movies Jurassic Park, The Talented Mr. Ripley, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, The Devil Wears Prada, The Social Network, and Clear and Present Danger each to be better than their source material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No nostalgia filter here. I just recently re-read the book and rewatched the movie and…. the movie is better in my opinion.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago

Fair enough. It's a fun movie with an excellent cast, but the capitalist edge leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Even Dennis Nedry in the book was an overworked, disgruntled employee who was partially a victim of capitalism himself. In the movie he mostly comes off as a greedy criminal. Although they did mention his "financial problems" in the movie.

It's been years since I've read the book, maybe I need to reread it. Maybe I'm viewing the book through a nostalgia lense.