GenZedong

8 readers

1 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

Serious posts can be posted here and/or in /c/GenZhou.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information.

Rules:

This community is explicitly pro-AES (China, Cuba, the DPRK, Laos and Vietnam)
No ableism, racism, misogyny, transphobia, etc.
No pro-imperialists, liberals or electoralists
No dogmatism/idealism (Trotskyism, Gonzaloism, Hoxhaism, anarchism, etc.)
Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

comradecarti@lemmygrad.ml

Kirbywithwhip1987@lemmygrad.ml

JucheEnjoyer@lemmygrad.ml

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

Soniloquio@lemmygrad.ml

Elara@lemmygrad.ml

ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml

American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml

Heraclitus predicted liberalism brainrot (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by sovietsnake@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sovietsnake@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I think Heraclitus case is more based since he literally speaks about the inherent dialectics in all sense of life, and the fact that they cannot understand it, which is literally what happens with liberals, not being able to understand dialectical materialism, so the resonance is bigger. While people say Heraclitus thought that fire was the arche, it honestly was just a metaphor for the logos (dialectics).