this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
187 points (96.5% liked)

History Memes

3541 readers
6 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm not familiar with the specifics of their argument (frankly I don't really want to know) but the Constitution conspicuously lacks an exit clause.

Edit: If I had to argue for legal secession, I would say that people have a natural right to self-government, and therefore to secession if they feel that their interests are not represented adequately in the national government. A natural right cannot be abrogated even willingly and any agreement that purports to do so is invalid, in the same way that a person's right to self-determination prevents him from rightfully being made a slave in any circumstances, even if he were to willingly sign a contract to that effect. But that's probably not what they're going for...