this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
648 points (84.0% liked)

Technology

75935 readers
2932 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One fundamental part of "intelligence" is being able to come up with independent thoughts. Another is to be able to think critically about those thoughts. LLMs cannot do either.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is it though? By which definition?

What is "thinking critically about thoughts"?
And what is an "independent thought"? Aren't our brains not just reacting to sensory inputs and dictated by the way our brains are wired?

Maybe we should go even further and clarify what a "thought" even is.

Are animals, who lack the higher cognitive functions, that humans have, therefore not "intelligent"? Are mentally impaired people no longer to be considered "intelligent"? If so, where is the line to be drawn? What are the specific definitions and criteria to correctly distinguish intelligence from non- or pseudo-intelligence?

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dunno mate, go read the wikipedia article or something.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, in that case I wonder why you were criticising the field of AI. Doesn't seem to be substantiated.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me not having the spoons to debate a necro comment doesn't make you right. ✌️

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

It find it unfortunate that you are unwilling to continue this discussion. I can only recommend to you to read more deeply about this topic in order to form a well founded and critical opinion, before judging things you do not seem to comprehend sufficiently.

Let me know as soon as you'd like to continue this matter. I am always open for a good discussion and good arguments.

(I am not sorry for "necroing", sometimes I'm just not in the mood and/or don't have the time to reply to various comments. But that's the beauty of discussion platforms: it's always possible to pick it up at a later time.)