Ukraine
Rules:
-
No sympathy with the enemy or its collaborators. Russian and North Korean soldiers are fascists committing a genocide. Remember that.
-
Objective and factual reporting from the battlefield, parliaments, etc. is encouraged, even if it's about bad news for Ukraine.
-
Insulting Putin and his cronies (Orban, Trump, Musk,...) is absolutely fine but don't use homophobic or similar language against them. Members of the queer community don't deserve to be compared to that scum. Also: Putin disciminates against gay people. If you do as well, you're part of the problem.
-
Don't insult or use overly harsh language against other commentators.
-
Don't submit direct links to Twitter/X and Truth Social posts. You may: Post a screenshot + quote, do a full quote and name the author, direct link to a proxy service like xcancel.com, deep link an image embedded in a tweet because Lemmy will cache a copy.
-
Don't just complain about paywalls. If you encounter one, be a sport and link to an archived version instead. Use Firefox + uBlock Origin with the annoyances filters enabled and https://filterlists.com/lists/bypass-paywalls-clean-filter to avoid encountering many in the first place.
view the rest of the comments

You are missing the point. Any security guarantee that Ukraine would accept has to have provisions for any such situation, otherwise they have zero reasons to accept it
I'm not saying such agreement won't be reached, I simply don't believe it will be honored when the time comes. It all rests on the assumption that Putin will be deterred by existence of such guarantees, but he won't. He will attack Ukraine again, and then what EU gonna do? They will do all they can to weasel out of it in order to avoid aforementioned all-out war. Maybe not by outright refusing, but by stalling, or sending only a token force, etc.
I think by now, we can all be certain that Putin will push the agreement to the limit. But that doesn't need to be an all out war, just a very well defended border.