A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.
Resources:
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
Does anyone know FLOSS replacements for Ground News?
I've seen some good things Ground News does.
Like seeing the same story under different media outlets and seeing representation of a story across the political spectrum.
I currently use RSS feed readers, I think something like what Ground is, would help organize my media at least.
This is the website: https://web.ground.news/
that's what lemmy does, with a slight bias towards communism...
It's more socialism than communism. But ofcourse depends on which side of lemmy you are on.
Well I for one only get my news from Hexbear
I see a lot of Marxism, Leninism and Stalinism. but people here are also more socialist in general.
I am trekkie then. I want a post scarcity future where EVERYONE is equal and all we care about is exploring space.
wtf
Socialiam is just people lying about communist tendencies because from each according to their ability to each accorsing to their contribution is foolish, as their output from capability is the contribution. To say otherwise is just more convoluted communism because you are juat changing the value metric on what their need is in the communist base ideaology of from each according to their ability to each according to their need.
Can't understand this, you'll have to simplify.
If you mean to say socialism is communism lite. Sure, that's exactly what it is. That's a good transitory model.
Direct transition is susceptible to hijacking by fascists.
There is no fundamental difference between socialism and communism. One says you get what you need, one says you get something based on what you contribute but need and contribute are not defined by the person they are defined by some external group based on nothing other than their feelings. It's just word games masking the underlying reality that one group is butt hurt about what some other group was able to get for their input and the first group wants to confiscate that output for themselves. Both groups concentrate power in government, both groups are very susceptible to being taken over by a strong man dictator, both don't end in utopia, they end in suffering under some dictator. Socialists are just communists trying to soften the language around what they are butt hurt about to make it more palatable in the hopes enough people fall for that stupidity that they can implement their confiscation plan to reach their utopia (which never, ever happens. It devolves into dictatorship and suffering or is in the process of doing that). Fascists are just another brand of utopian dictator that ends in suffering (their rhetoric seems to be built around disgust rather than envy but other than that it's a train to the same gulag).
Slight?
almost not noticeable.