AssholeDesign

9835 readers

45 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world

167

Leave it to a Bezos-owned company to confuse customers and mislead them for profit. (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 month ago by tfm@piefed.europe.pub to c/assholedesign@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35308060

Misleading pricing:

Using the billing period as the header and showing the price for the billing period... except for monthly—which shows 1/4 the price and says "every week" in smaller, gray text.

Punishing non-subscription payments:

Adding a $6.50 (1400%) surcharge for wanting a weekly one-time payment instead of a recurring subscription.

Charging more for longer periods:

Monthly billing, once you remove the dark pattern and convert it to its actual price, is $2. There are 12 months in a year, meaning it would cost $24 to maintain that subscription for a year.

Why is the yearly subscription $29, then?

If you want to verify this for yourself, you're going to need to clear your cookies and reload an article a lot. They do A/B tests and show different subscription requied modals. This one was the worst.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Let’s see if I can math.

$7 a week x 52 weeks is $364 a year

50¢ a week x 52 weeks is $26 a year

$29 a year is $29 a year