this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
67 points (95.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1535 readers
276 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Got banned from !energy@slrpnk.net for pointing out that it was a big reach to say that wind power is included in the term "solar energy". The mod referenced a temp ban from two years ago? Tried to say I've got a "history" of trolling and harassment, as well that I "doxxed" user DMs which also happened two years ago. I even, at the time, talked with the mod involved and reposted that comment without the DM screenshots. Like I don't have an entirely squeaky clean modlog but it's only a single page over two years? What the fluff? Like it's a two week ban and I could hardly care but jeeze this feels like overreach.

https://slrpnk.net/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=518329

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think CSP uses air like wind, pretty sure they generally use water. Also, we're using man made tech to move wind turbines just like CSP. Hell, if we want to get into the weeds of it, photovoltaic panels are less solar than wind as they can only use a small wavelength of light to create electricity and hates too much thermal energy while wind uses all the heat energy that doesn't escape.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

But the manmade tech is interacting with wind in the wind turbine case. If we wanna get really stupid about it then even fossil fuels are solar because the organics that turned into fossil fuels were all supported by the sun and they just served as single use solar batteries.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

See, now that is a reach as the solar energy is first converted into chemical energy with fossil fuels while wind is thermal to kinetic just like CSP. Also, the wind is created by man made tech, global warming for instance is man made tech that increases the wind in some regions as well as heat islands, sky scrapers, forest clearing and turbulence from wind turbines themselves. The only real difference is scale, CSP is at small scale and wind is at large scale.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course its a reach - that was the point

Anyway I'm disengaging have a nice day

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not a reach for CSP to be solar so it's not for wind to be a form of solar power. CSP doesn't use chlorophyll to create hydrocarbons thus has no association with solar power sources. Clearly you understand this distinction and are now backing out.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No, I've realised that we are talking past eachother and am disengaging. Have a nice day.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We're really not talking past eachother, you are deliberately being dishonest. In CSP is solar, wind is simply non concentrated solar. You responded with how that makes fossil fuels solar as if stored chemical energy over millennia is the exact same thing as the sun's rays heating a fluid that very same day. There's nothing to disengage from, it's literally just the vibes for you on what a word means, it's pretty common in green movements to see wind as a type of solar. Without the sun the wind will stop, we would have years of fossil fuels, geothermal, and nuclear power remaining.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

Please refrain from replying further. I have informed you twice of the fact that I would like to disengage. I won't be baited back into the discussion. Please respect my desire to end this communication.