this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
611 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

665 readers
112 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
LadyButterfly@lemmy.world
CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
foxglove@lazysoci.al
LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone
dandelion@piefed.blahaj.zone
611
A simple dictionary… (lazysoci.al)
submitted 3 weeks ago by ZDL@lazysoci.al to c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Is it clear?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] klemptor@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not, but if you actually need a rebuttal, let's go:

- insecure pose is related to its brethren of other insecure poses, such as the peace sign ✌️😉✌️, tongue sticking out😜, duck lips😙

What about this pose is in any way insecure? She is confidently giving the finger to those who don't respect consent.

- there is this weird lust for such poses

This is your own opinion and not substantiated by anything here as far as I can see.

- the brand clothing indicating commodity fetishism aka lust

There's nothing wrong with people liking brand-name clothes. You personally may have a beef with it but calling it 'lust' is not justified by anything in the image.

- the coffee indicating lack of self control and gluttony/lust aka addiction

Again with the 'lust'? Coffee is such a normal thing. There's nothing here to indicate she's addicted, or a glutton, or in any way out of control. You're reading an insane amount into this simple drawing.

- expectation for others to read your mind when speaking indirectly, vaguely, or with innuendo

It's not an expectation. She's spelling out exactly the ways in which people try to ignore a woman's lack of consent.

- closed-mindedness to the world of opportinity

Opportunity to what, have sex she doesn't want to have? Are you serious right now?

- the sublte implication of superiority

Substantiate this please, because again, there's nothing in the image supporting this claim.

- the callous disregard for the other person

You mean the person who's callously disregarding her by ignoring the very clear lack of consent? Because that's the type of person this image is aimed at.

- the lack of empathy

Same comment as above. Who exactly does she owe empathy?

- the excessive self-conciet and pride in oneself

Again, totally unsubstantiated in the image. She's allowed to be proud of herself just like anybody else, but there's nothing excessive here.

You've read a lot of nonsense into this image. Maybe have a think about why that is.