this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
68 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

2700 readers
260 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Sure, I agree with this. In theory absolute privacy would be nice. But then there's reality and the exceptions are there for a reason. But they're also the cause for the issue here. No one could call for surveillance if it was absolute. The exceptions are the gateway. Politicians say we need to tackle crime and balance that, so we need mass surveillance to keep people under control. And that's the point where things get complicated... Of course granting unlimited rights to commit crimes isn't an option either, that impedes with my rights.