this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
171 points (100.0% liked)
retrocomputing
5741 readers
8 users here now
Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, it wasn't.
It was to speed access to data. Unless you have some evidence the researchers who work with electromechanics at the time were thinking "how can we replace humans", rather than "how can we represent 80 columns of data electromechanically?"
No need for this nonsensical hyperbole.
I mean, I'm sure cost savings on labour were noticed as well. And that's not a bad thing.