this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

news

153 readers
645 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's slightly hard to understand how this sort of thing is so common. When I have been in factories with industrial robots, the things are inside enclosures.

In this case the robot had been moved and was being maintained and struck the man when its motor was removed. It sounds like the arm was not properly secured and that the people carrying out the work were not properly trained for it.

Don't get me wrong, sounds like Tesla should be liable. The damages seem very high, but the US legal system is odd.

[–] jonne 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, if you're not trained for a dangerous task and your employer still requires you to do it, and you get hurt, there should definitely be consequences for that employer.

load more comments (1 replies)