this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
265 points (99.3% liked)

World News

50162 readers
2811 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A procurement plan obtained by POLITICO shows Berlin’s rearmament spree will overwhelmingly benefit European industry.

Germany's new military procurement plan, obtained by POLITICO, shows that Berlin will steer its massive rearmament drive primarily to European industry, with only 8 percent going for American weapons.

That's a blow for Donald Trump, who has been putting pressure on European countries to continue buying U.S. arms despite the geopolitical turmoil emanating from the White House.

The procurement plan shows Germany preparing to push through nearly €83 billion in contracts over the next year. The list, drawn up for the German parliament’s budget committee, details 154 major defense purchases between September 2025 and December 2026.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if the AfD takes power, there is no chance they're using Germany's military against me.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

as long as you are not a "terrorist"

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you think I am German or something? The AfD is never even going to know my name.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All they have to do to know your name is type your ip in a database

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you think the AfD is going to

  1. take real power in Germany
  2. decide I am someone of interest
  3. find my IP
  4. look up that IP and connect it to my real identity
  5. decide to use military assets against me

None of this chain of events is likely. Yes, it's possible to find people's real identity from their online identity, but what about the rest of it?

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What makes you think there is any chance that the AfD is going to carry out war-on-terror style extrajudicial killings on me?

You don't even know anything about me or my circumstances; you clearly don't think this is actually likely because that would be stupid. I, with knowledge of my own situation, can tell you it is vanishingly improbable.

You started this subthread because people were in favour of Germany increasing military spending to counter the threat from Russia. Russia carrying out extra-judicial, extra-territorial killings, waging wars of conquest, carrying out ethnic cleansing and mass repression is not a possibility - it is happening right now.

When we assess whether the risk of future misuse of military assets is worth it, we need to be clear about what it is those military assets are for - they are precisely to prevent the misuse, as we see it, of the military assets of foreign states against our own citizens. When such aggression is rare, such as between 1991 and 2014, it is better to reduce the size of the military. When aggression is on the rise, it is necessary to increase it again.