this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
418 points (98.2% liked)

196

18452 readers
120 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arsCynic@beehaw.org 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

For f*&% sake, I'm using JPEG XL on my website for some high res images that are amazingly well compressed using it, and especially to reduce the repository size on Codeberg. Only now discovered that only my niche main browser, Zen, renders them. What a stupid decision; their compression of high quality images is superior. Perfect to use alongside AVIF which does better in low quality images and illustrations and the like, or PNG which is best at preserving images containing text such as screenshots.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I had the luxury of seeing incredibly smart engineers speak about their new innovations for web development.

I then got to watch them get hired by Google and paid extremely well to release those innovations, with the support of a bunch of other brilliant people, often under a open-source label.

I then get to see people go, "Google Bad!" About those features, and because it was paid for by Google, they don't even want to touch it.

[–] blind3rdeye@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

Google is an enormous beast. It doesn't care about you, or me, or the good of anyone. Sometimes its goals happen to align with a common good for awhile - and so good stuff can come from that. But often their goal do not, and they cause harm while crushing any possible alternative path. And as time goes on, less and less of what google does is for the common good.

For that reason, I think it is unwise to support google. Supporting them further entrenches their power, preventing others from contributing.

The smart engineers you spoke of would still be smart engineers with or without google. Google didn't create them. They can still contribute with or without Google. But Google did direct their efforts to suit Google's own needs. - Sometimes that's also good for other people, but often it is not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)